Oakland County formed a Citizen’s Grand Jury in the spring or early summer of 2011 to examine several cold cases, including the OCCK case. I have heard rumors that the OCCK case was added after the original filing, but I need clarification on this fact. The media has reported that two suspects in other cases were indicted and convicted as result of these grand jury proceedings.

Interestingly, the media reported the Oakland County Prosecutor introduced mDNA evidence in one of the other cases. However, as discussed previously in this Story, the OCP had advised me that the mDNA match between Vince Gunnels and Kristine Mihelich is not admissible. What’s good for the goose should be good for the gander!

Since I have received no reports on the Oakland Grand Jury findings on the OCCK portion of the grand jury, I have assumed no one was indicted in the OCCK case. The privacy provisions of the Grand Jury Statute limit third party inquiries on this result.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

The Michigan Grand Jury Statute provides for a Citizen’s Grand Jury and a Judicial Grand Jury. A Citizen’s Grand Jury is heard by a jury of 15 to 20 citizens and has a term of one year. A Judicial Grand Jury is held before a judge and the one year term can be extended under certain conditions. If a crime involves more than one county, the statute provides that the hearing can be held in one county rather than requiring each county spending its time and money for this purpose.

This multiple county provision has particular application to the OCCK case because Tim’s body was found in Wayne County and all other activities took place in Oakland County. The use of one Grand Jury is the better procedure. For example, if Wayne County considered Suspect A was the murderer and Oakland County sought indictment against Suspect B, both suspects could argue innocence because the other suspect was guilty. But what if both suspects participated in the murder? For instance what if Suspect A procured young children who were abused by Suspect B? Even worse, what if there is an organized group involving many other individuals?

The MSP reports indicate that Kym Worthy, the Wayne County Prosecutor, was considering a grand jury as early as October 15, 2008. The entry states that she wanted to examine several redacted names and “Cabot”. Ralph Cabot was the Genesee County polygrapher who examined Christophe r Busch on January 27, 1977. Did Wayne County formed a Judicial Grand Jury in the fall of 2010 after discussions with the Oakland County on a one county grand jury were unsuccessful or was this during the time that Jessica Cooper would not talk with Kym Worthy? I would like clarification of this fact.

Wayne County advised me in 2015 that its Grand Jury did not indict anyone and was terminated after several extensions.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

The Busch criminal files in both Genesee and Oakland County contain provisions that Christopher Busch will not be granted probation. However the ultimate result in both Counties was probation and no one will explain this result to me.

On June 29, 1977 the Genesee County Assistant Prosecutor Judith Fullerton wrote to the Montmorency County Prosecutor and stated as follows;

“Our office will allow Busch to plead guilty to Assault with Intent to Do Criminal Sexual Conduct Involving Penetration, but we will not enter into a sentence concession whereby Busch will be placed on probation.”

You will recall that Gregory Greene, the co-defendant in this case, was sentenced to life in prison and Busch, who did the same child, received probation. Ms. Fullerton is now a Circuit Judge and refused to talk to me when I twice tried to call her.

In the summer of 2012 Chief Assistant Prosecutor Paul Walton gave me the
Complaint in the Oakland County criminal file against Busch. It contained a handwritten note “No Deals R. Thompson”. He told me this meant no prosecutor could settle the case without his approval. Walton stated that if it happened today he would fire the Assistant Prosecutor who settled a No Deal case without his permission. I will discuss this aspect of the case in my Chapter on Mr. Thompson.
The results in these two cases support my concerns that who the defendant is may be more important than what he did. Do you agree?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Chapter 49: Richard Thompson

Richard Thompson was the Chief Assistant Prosecutor in Oakland County in 1977 and succeeded L. Brooks Patterson as Prosecutor. He drove to Flint in a snowstorm to attend the polygraph examination of Christopher Busch on January 28, 1977. Thompson attended the examination to determine if Busch was involved in the murder of Mark Stebbins, the first victim. On February 22, 1977 the Sunday News published an article stating that Busch was not involved in the Stebbins case because he had passed the lie detector test.
In early 2011 a member of the Birmingham Senior Men’s Club asked me if I would like to meet Thompson and I attended a function in his neighborhood. When introduced Thompson associated my case to a blue Gremlin. While we could not talk that night I contacted him later and mailed him a letter on June 20, 2011 requesting a meeting and providing him with some file material. Thompson stated that he did not remember much about this case. Although Thompson originally agreed to meet with me I received no further information to meet and discuss my original or subsequent letters. Since Thompson was from Oakland County this should not have been a surprise.

Among the papers I mailed Thompson was a handwritten police report dated January 28. 1977 of a Busch interview stating “Officers advised him Greg Greene told these officers that he, Busch, had killed Stebbins”. If you were examining the Stebbins case would you follow up on this lead?

The documents also included an undated email from MSP Sergeant Garry Gray to MSP Lieutenant Darryl Hill stating “…and Dick Thompson from the Oakland County Prosecutor’s office believed these two men were involved in the child murders.”

As both the Chief Assistant Prosecutor and then Prosecutor Thompson was responsible for managing the OCCK case for more than a decade. If you were responsible for solving the most heinous unsolved crime in Michigan would you remember what you did? Is this another instance where the Oakland County officials have conspired to cover up for 40 years the status of these murders for reasons unknown to the victims and the public?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

The public body in FOIA cases has both the burden of proof and the burden of going forward to claim any exemption from production of documents. In my second FOIA case the Oakland County Prosecutor told the court she had returned all police reports. Quite obviously, if you do not have a document you cannot deliver it. The Oakland County Circuit Court denied me any discovery from the OCP in the trial court, and the November 20, 2012 delivery of the police reports was after the discovery cutoff date.

Interestingly, this subject was raised by the Court of Appeals during my oral argument. I do not have a transcript of the hearing, but I recall one of the judges asking Assistant Prosecutor Jeffrey Kaelin if his office had replied accurately regarding documents to the trial court. Kaelin turned and asked Assistant Prosecutor Thomas Grden, who was also in the court room, for advice and then replied the statement was essentially true.

How does a citizen protect his request for documents in a FOIA case if the public body deliberately or mistakenly states that it does not have the document? What would you do in your FOIA case under these facts?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather



Chapter 47: False Affidavit???

In my second FOIA Case, Chief Assistant Prosecutor Paul Walton filed a Bill of Particulars which he signed with an accompanying Affidavit dated August 8, 2012, which states in Paragraph 3(k) as follows:

(k) To prepare my PowerPoint presentation, detailing the strengths and weaknesses of the ongoing aspects of the OCCK investigation, I spent in excess of 200 hours of work, and reviewed literally thousands of pages of documents from source information from FBI and State Police files. During this extensive review of the FBI and State Police files, investigators from the FBI and State Police remained present with their records, acting as both custodians of these records as well as sources of information, as they were almost continuously queried during the review of these records. Upon completion of the review of these records, the materials were returned in their entirety to the FBI and State Police and are not now, nor were they at the time of Plaintiff’s FOIA requests, in the possession of the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office. These materials were also not copied or logged by the Oakland County Prosecutor’s office, but returned after being reviewed.

On November 20, 2012, in response to my third FOIA request, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Thomas R. Grden, provided me with 606 pages which contained the following police information from the files of the Oakland County Prosecutor:

a. Michigan Department of State Police Supplemental Incident Report with an original date of February 21, 2008, containing 24 pages.

b. City of Livonia Narrative Report dated March 6, 2008, of a police interview of James Vincent Gunnel, containing 71 pages.

c. Telephone conversations of Vince Gunnels, containing 44 pages.

d. FBI laboratory report dated November 10, 2008 addressed to the Michigan State Police, containing 3 pages.

e. City of Southfield Police Department Narrative Report containing newspaper article entitled “No Slaying in Flint Case” because Christopher Busch had passed a polygraph test

f. City of Livonia Narrative Report dated July 31, 2007 from Detective Sergeant Cory M. Williams related to the Oakland County Child Killings, containing 104 pages.

g. Michigan State Police Interview Report of Lawrence Wasser dated November 30, 2007, containing 50 pages.

h. Several other inserts of less than 10 pages, which appear to be police reports.

The documents which I received on November 20, 2012 contradict the statement of Walton that he had returned all of the police reports. Do you agree with me that the Oakland County Prosecutor owes an explanation not only to me, but to the Oakland County Circuit Court for filing what was a false Affidavit? Rule 3.3 of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct place this obligation on any attorney who has knowledge of submitting a false statement to a court.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather



Chapter 46: North Fox Island

The Michigan State Police reports contain one small paragraph reference to Christopher Busch having a suitcase of pornographic photographs on North Fox Island. Since Busch was apparently not indicted for his possession of these pictures this prompted my inquiry of this location.

The King Family learned that North Fox Island was an island in Traverse Bay, outside of Traverse City, Michigan. Someone, using an assumed name, had purchased the Island and put in an airplane runway. The Island was then used as a camp for young boys from Detroit who were flown to the island and then sexually abused. The owner was later identified as Francis Sheldon from Grosse Pointe, Michigan, who moved to the Netherlands. He was never extradited or indicted before he died. There were reports that Busch and his pornographic films were delivered to Flint, Michigan, but that no further action was taken against him.

An amazing part of the North Fox Island story is the lack of media coverage over this horrendous operation at that time. It should be a lesson to all of us that people in high places were involved in pedophile activity in the 1970s. North Fox Island was not purchased by a high school coach or a police officer. It should also be a lesson that Christopher Busch was involved in major pedophile activities in addition to his four (4) convictions.

What is the relationship to North Fox Island to the OCCK murders? I have seen no direct connection between these two (2) situations. However, it is a lesson to us that in the 1970s there was substantial pedophile activity which involved many wealthy people and no publicity. It also supports my conclusion that these people in high places were involved in pedophile activity and they did not procure their victims themselves. Don’t forget that four adults called me after the Busch photo was published with reports that he tried to pick them up. Does Charles Busch have any recollection of his brother’s North Fox Island activities?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

The King Family has received four unrelated reports that the OCCK murderer was the son of an automobile or GM executive. I initially referred to them as urban legends but my children said we lived in the suburbs and therefore I changed the Title to Suburban Legends for this Chapter.

Within three or four weeks after Marney Keenan of The Detroit News published her first Article on OCCK Case on October 26, 2009, a young man knocked at my door and wanted to speak at me. He had played on the same hockey team as my son, Tim, and made this report. He stated 18 years ago he was working in a clothing store and had a number of police officers as customers. On one occasion he asked a police customer if he was working on any interesting cases. The officer did not reply and started to leave the store. He then returned and told Nummer that he had been working on the OCCK Case, and that the murderer had been identified as the son of a prominent GM Executive. Nummer was quite surprised that if this information was made available to him that it had not been made available to my family.

During the same period of time Marney Keenan, the Detroit News Reporter, received a phone call from a lady who identified herself as a teacher of Kristine Mihelich, the third victim. The teacher reported that she was drinking at the Salamander Bar in the Pontchartrain Hotel in Detroit one evening next to a police officer. She inquired about the status of the Mihelich case, and the officer replied that it had been solved and that the murderer was the son of a prominent automobile executive.

My children, Cathy and Chris, went to college at Marquette University with an acquaintance who also grew up in the Birmingham area. This lady advised my children that she was drinking in a bar in Chicago where she met a police officer from this area. She asked him about the status of the OCCK Case and was advised that the Case had been solved and that the murderer was the son of a prominent automobile executive.

The fourth source of these continuing legends came to my attention when my daughter, Cathy, published her WordPress article on May 20, 2016. In this article, she reported she had received the following message:

“Hi Cathy,

I was a teenager in Detroit at the time and my father had a stamp and coin store at Eastland Shopping Center. One of his customers was E. Harwood Rydholm, a big executive at Chrysler. Mr. Rydholm told my dad that that OCCK was the son of a powerful GM exec and that the police were protecting GM’s reputation so he probably wouldn’t be arrested. Mr. Rydholm passed away in 1987. The ghastly part is that Mr. Rydholm told my father this story shortly have Kristine Mihelich went missing.”

These four unrelated reports all indicate that the OCCK murderer was the son of a prominent GM or automobile executive. They all took place during the 30 years of silence between 1977 and 2007 during which no one from law enforcement talked to the King Family. To my knowledge, no one from law enforcement talked to these individuals after the King Family went public in October 2009. As you can imagine, the King Family has legitimate concerns that these Reports are not coincidental. If anyone reading this Chapter has any other similar information, please bring it to my attention.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

The earlier Chapter was from a previous draft and not final copy. This revised Chapter includes the questions and answers from Gunnels, which I omitted from the previous copy.

As we noted in chapters 30 & 31 Ted Lamborgine was the first person of more than 300 suspects in the OCCK Case to fail a polygraph examination. This information was made available to the King family in October 2013 when we received additional police reports.

The Michigan State Police reports I received on December 15, 2010 also indicate that Vince Gunnels, another identified suspect, was polygraphed on July 30, 2009 but the results were redacted in these reports. However, in response to a subsequent request, on November 20, 2012 the Oakland County Prosecutor provided me with her records regarding Vince Gunnels containing the un-redacted polygraph report that he completely failed all aspects of the examination and stated as follows:


Other that the control questions, Gunnels were asked three specific questions regarding the Child Killing Investigation. Due to his DNA, hair being discovered on Kristine Mihelich, he was asked the following:

1. Did you participate in any way in the killing of Kristine Mihelich?

2. Do you know for sure, who killed Kristine Mihelich?

3. Did you have any physical contact with Kristine Mihelich?

(See attached Exam report for all questions asked)

Lt. Dykstra after reviewing the three separate charts involve in the polygraph of James Vincent Gunnels, concluded that Mr. Gunnels, “Completely” failed all aspects of said examination. DPD officer Dan who is a polygraph trainee of Dykstra also concurred with the findings.


After reviewing the polygraphs, Lt. Dykstra sat down with Gunnels to explain the results. Detective Gary Williams, Robertson and S.A. Callaghan witnessed on closed circuit television, an interesting statement made by Gunnels after being advised that he failed the test. Lt. Dykstra said to Gunnels: “I received the charts and it shows that you failed the exam”, “Vince I think you’re involved with this”. Gunnels responded by saying, “Okay!” Gunnels never became upset or even reacted in a disgusted, matter of fact manner, that he didn’t do it. He was very quiet and reserved when Dykstra made the statement of believing he was involved and failed the test. His lone single response was, “Okay.”

Gunnels made additional statements advising that he didn’t know the girl and has absolutely no idea how his DNA was on her person. He said he was not with that girl and denied ever knowing Kristine Mihelich. As the posttest interview continued, Gunnels became more and more upset and appeared to speak in a more matter of fact fashion that he wasn’t involved. As Dykstra, insisted that the only reason he failed the examination was because he was involved and knew something.

At this particular point in the posttest interview, the undersigned was advised that it was permissible to record the interview/exchange between Dykstra and Gunnels because Gunnels had been advised of his rights and voluntarily waive same. D/Sgt. Robertson digitally recorded the remainder of Lt. Dykstra’s interview with Gunnels. ***”

If I publish polygraph results I am guilty of a crime. If an Assistant Prosecutor does the same act no one is disciplined.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Since Jessica Copper, the Oakland County Prosecutor, won’t talk to me about the OCCK case, I am setting forth my questions and conclusions regarding the polygraph situation as follows.

1. In Jessica Cooper’s letter on November 13, 2009, was she warning me that she would bring criminal proceedings against me for any publicity on the possible Christopher Busch involvement in the OCCK case as the result of the polygraph by Lawrence Wasser that was never taken?

2. In February 1977 the Oakland County Prosecutor publicly stated that Christopher Busch was not involved in the Mark Stebbins murder because he passed a polygraph test and he gave this information to at least two newspapers.

3. The Oakland County Prosecutor stated under oath that Busch did not pass the February 27, 1977 polygraph when she submitted the search warrant affidavit to the 48th District Court on October 28, 2008.

4. The first person to fail a polygraph test was Ted Lamborgine in 2005 (chapter’s 30 & 31).

5. When Assistant Prosecutor, Thomas Grden reported the failure of Vince Gunnels to pass his July 31 2009 polygraph examination. Jessica Cooper took no action to charge her staff with a crime.

6. If the Oakland County Prosecutor publicly states that a suspect passed a polygraph examination, should any subsequent results to the contrary also be made public?

7. What is the position of Jessica Cooper on enforcing the publication of the criminal provisions of the polygraph statute?

8. Did L. Brooks Patterson violate this statute in 1977?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather